A cross-country configurational approach to international academic mobility: exploring mobility effects on academics’ career progression in EU countries.

Abstract

This study takes a novel perspective on mobility as career script compliance to explore the factors that might influence how mobile academics in a country perceive the impact of international mobility on their overall academic career progression and job options. We conduct a country-level qualitative comparative analysis on a sample of 24 European Union (EU) countries, based on data from European Commission’s MORE3 indicator tool. We find that these perceptions about the impact are shaped by the dominant patterns of mobility in that country, and the general perception of academics in that particular country that international mobility is rewarded in the institutional promotion schemes. This study introduces new explanatory factors for the career script for international mobility. In so doing, we provide a richer understanding of how countries might influence academics’ mobility, which sheds light on previous inconclusive empirical evidence linking international mobility and academics’ careers. Our findings have implications for the policy design of international mobility and open up new lines of inquiry for cross-country comparisons.

Publication
Higher Education

Highlights

  1. We adopt the approach of international mobility as career script compliance and conduct a country-level qualitative comparative analysis to explore the factors related to academics' international mobility outcomes.
  2. We propose a model to identify multiple pathways (combining types of mobility and academic career system characteristics) leading to perceived academic career progression.
  3. We find that national context and the specific design of promotion criteria are important conditions for academics to perceive that long-term mobility is beneficial for their career progression.
  4. The mobility career script exerts a steering effect in researchers’ decisions to move abroad.
  5. Our findings adds new elements to refine mobility policies and make them more effective.